Hey Bob- First, you've done a great job hosting the list here, and all. So, it is with all due respect that I mention this: Are we still on two lists, or did the group finally decide to merge into one? I keep getting two copies of just about everything people send to TCWUG lists, and I think that's a bit wasteful. Perhaps now that we have outgrown one list, this would be a perfect time to consolidate into a single list. Again, Bob, nothing personal to you; you've done a great service getting the TCWUG group moving online and communicating. I just want to see if we can put an end to seeing every message on the list twice. :) Regards, ---Matthew Genelin--- -----Original Message----- From: tcwug-announce-bounces at tcwug.org [mailto:tcwug-announce-bounces at tcwug.org]On Behalf Of Bob Tanner Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 11:46 AM To: tcwug-announce at tcwug.org; tcwug-list at tcwug.org Subject: [Tcwug-announce] Upgrading the tcwug mailing list server #1: We have outgrown (disk space-wise) the mailing list server. #2: I'm also tired of maintaining Red Hat 7.3 packages to keep the box up to date and secure. So, it's time to migrate and upgrade the tcwug-* mailing lists to a new system. I'll be migrating the mailing lists over to a new box (shadowknight) today (01/18) with 80G dedicated to the archives. Solves #1. At the same time, I'll be upgrading to Debian :-) (flame-bait?) to easy the burden of maintaining this box. Solves #2. I will also be turning on VERP, so some of the smtp headers will be different, so adjust your procmail recipes accordingly. -- Bob Tanner <tanner at mn-linux.org> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 http://www.linuxjustworks.com | Linux Just Works! Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288