Yeah, denying interclient traffic is kind of what I had in mind. I wonder if they're doing that. Regarding the firewall rules, I'm not sure what value add they might have. Mike Ellsworth The WiMAX Guys, LLC StratVantage Consulting, LLC 952-525-1584 mellsworth at stratvantage.com www.StratVantage.com www.TheWiMAXGuys.com Get a free one-hour wireless network evaluation. Forward this message to freebie at theWiMAXGuys.com They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Ben Franklin, ~1784 -----Original Message----- From: tcwug-list-bounces at tcwug.org [mailto:tcwug-list-bounces at tcwug.org] On Behalf Of Andy Warner Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:12 AM To: Mike Ellsworth Cc: 'Twin Cities Wireless Users Group List' Subject: Re: [TCWUG] Another point on the wifi hotspot business model curve.. Mike Ellsworth wrote: > The most interesting thing I got from this article is T-Mobile's claim that > it is more secure (and more reliable) than free hotspots. Anybody got any > idea how they can claim that? I've used their service and it wasn't running > any security as far as I could tell. What about firewall rules to/from the internet and between attached clients ? I can see them having a canned config that might be better than some coffee store owner with a cable modem and a linksys - both running nearly default config.. -- andyw at pobox.com Andy Warner Voice: (612) 801-8549 Fax: (208) 575-5634 _______________________________________________ Twin Cities Wireless Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.tcwug.org tcwug-list at tcwug.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tcwug-list _______________________________________________ Twin Cities Wireless Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.tcwug.org tcwug-list at tcwug.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tcwug-list